Skip to content

Take TelnetNegotiationCore 4.11.0 for its ECHO fixes - #130

Merged
HarryCordewener merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-fkigqi
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

HarryCordewener merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-fkigqi

Conversation

@HarryCordewener

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Bumps TelnetNegotiationCore 4.9.0 → 4.11.0, which carries HarryCordewener/TelnetNegotiationCore#186:

  • A client answers a server's WONT ECHO with DONT ECHO when the server was echoing (it sent nothing before).
  • A repeated WILL ECHO while the server is already echoing is no longer answered with DO ECHO (RFC 854/1143), so two implementations cannot loop on it.

This matters at a password prompt, where local echo now follows the server's ECHO state (#128). No source change was needed; TelnetSession's OnEchoStateChanged hook is unchanged.

Checks: dotnet build -c Release SharpMUTerm.slnx clean, 0 warnings. All seven suites green except Core's AReadOnlyCacheDirectory_DegradesToMemoryOnly, which fails only because this container runs as root (unrelated, fails on main here too).

CHANGELOG updated under Unreleased → Fixed.


Generated by Claude Code

4.11.0 answers a server's WONT ECHO with DONT ECHO when it was echoing and
stops answering a repeated WILL ECHO (RFC 1143), which matters at a password
prompt now that local echo follows the server's ECHO state (#128).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Rqqt7WwMmhxVJpERSzReCy
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

@HarryCordewener
HarryCordewener marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2026 01:24
@HarryCordewener
HarryCordewener merged commit 696da92 into main Nov 11, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants