chore(openspec): delete three abandoned exploration stubs - #507
Merged
Conversation
`openspec/changes/` held three folders containing only `exploration.md`: `bound-generation-length` (#422), `reach-same-verdicts` (#427) and `surface-merged-body-contradictions` (#409). All three issues shipped and closed WITHOUT an SDD cycle -- #422 via PR #439, #427 via PR #438, #409 via PRs #442/#443 -- so these are abandoned exploration notes, not parked work. They are deleted rather than archived: every one of the 30+ entries under `openspec/changes/archive/` is a completed SDD cycle carrying proposal/design/tasks/specs plus an archive report, and none holds a single file. Moving exploration-only stubs there would redefine the archive from "finished cycle" to "folder I stopped using". Git history keeps the notes if they are ever wanted. `openspec/changes/` now holds only `archive/`.
This was referenced Aug 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
openspec/changes/held three folders containing onlyexploration.md:surface-merged-body-contradictionsbound-generation-lengthreach-same-verdictsAll three issues are closed and shipped without an SDD cycle. Someone explored, decided not to formalize, and implemented directly. These are abandoned notes, not parked work.
Why deleted and not archived
Every one of the 30+ entries under
openspec/changes/archive/is a completed SDD cycle carryingproposal.md,design.md,tasks.md,specs/andarchive-report.md. Counting files per folder, none holds a single file.Filing exploration-only stubs there would redefine the archive from "finished cycle" to "folder I stopped using", which costs the directory its meaning. Git history keeps the notes if they are ever wanted.
openspec/changes/now holds onlyarchive/.Disclosure: no review receipt
Consent was granted (lineage
review-0c001660a6a37b48, medium risk, one focus lens).review-reliabilityreturnedinspection.status: "incomplete"with zero findings: the lens agents are configured with only Read/Grep/Glob and cannot run the read-only Git commands the contract requires against the frozen trees. It did not substitute the live worktree, which is the correct fail-closed behavior.That is the third lens agent to fail identically today across two candidates, so the outcome is structural rather than transient. Nothing was captured — an access failure is not completion — and the lineage stayed in
state: reviewingwithreceipt: expected_missing. Shipping without a receipt is the maintainer's explicit decision, as in PRs #503 and #506.